Divert Court of Dallas County
Cost/Benefit Analysis
By Dr. Thomas B. Fomby and Ms. Vasudha Rangaprasad, of the Southern Methodist University Department of Economics
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• This is a follow-up study of the DIVERT Court recidivism study of August, 2001 written by Ms. Monica Turley
and Ms. Ashley Sibley of the Psychology Department of Southern Methodist University in August 2001 entitled "Presentation
of Outcome Evaluation Findings DIVERT Advisory Board." Their study examined the recidivism behavior of 178 Divert Court participants
and 78 Control Group participants over a twenty-seven month follow-up period. They found a statistically significant reduction
in recidivism arising from participation in the DIVERT Court program.
• This study analyzes a cost-benefit ledger based on the event histories of the participants in the Turley/Sibley
recidivism study. The ledger is based on 15 months of "treatment" costs for each participant and, after treatment, the savings
to society from reduced recidivism arising from DIVERT Court treatment.
• This study finds the Benefit-Cost ratio associated with the DIVERT Court program over a 40 month follow-up
period to be 9.43:1. That is, on average, for every dollar spent on upgrading drug treatment from the Control group (traditional
adjudication) to drug treatment through DIVERT Court, $9.43 of costs can be saved by society over a 40 month post-treatment
period. Even though this Benefit-Cost ratio is quite substantial, it is still a conservative estimate of the benefits forthcoming
from the DIVERT Court program for reasons detailed in the report.